Expert Witness Experience of
Michael Ian Shamos

MAJOR EXPERT WITNESS CLIENTS

Bank of America

Bertelsmann AG

Clubcorp, Inc.

C. W. Communications

eBay, Inc.

Florida Attorney General

Freemarkets, Inc.

IBM Corp.

Levinson Steel

Lowe's Companies, Inc.

Maryland Attorney General

The Princeton Review, Inc.

Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Soverain Software LLC

Target Corp.

20th Century Fox

UBS Warburg

Universal Studios

Visa International

 

 


Dr. Shamos serves as an expert witness in computer software and electronic voting cases.  He has participated in the following:

C.W. Communications, Inc. v. International Research Service, Inc., Civil Action No. 84-890, (W.D. Pa. 1984), aff'd. Case No. 88-3331 (3d Cir., Oct. 31, 1988).  Dr. Shamos testified for plaintiff publisher as to the fame of its "Computerworld" trademark.  Result:   permanent injunction against defendant.  Judge McCune's Memorandum and Order states. "We accept the conclusion drawn by Dr. Shamos."

E.F. Hutton, Inc. v. Gipson (W.D. Pa. 1985).  Dr. Testified for defendant-counterclaimant physician as to fraud in the inducement by a computer hardware supplier.  Plaintiff had provided capital financing for the purchase.   Result: defendant was awarded compensatory damages + $250,000 punitive damages.

In re Comprehensive Business Systems, 119 B.R. 573 (S.D. Ohio 1990).  Testified for a secured creditor in a bankruptcy case in which the creditor sought to obtain software still in development for which it had advanced over $2 million in funding.  Dr. Shamos opined as to the value of the incomplete software.  Result: the creditor was able to purchase the software from the Trustee for $67,500.  The Court referred in its opinion to "the testimony of the eminent and impressive Dr. Shamos."

Levinson Steel Co. v. American Software, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 96-282, W.D. Pa. (1996).  Testified for plaintiff concerning bad faith estimates of computer processing capacity resulting in delivery of an inadequate system.  Result: settlement in favor of plaintiff in an undisclosed amount.  Contact: Reed Smith LLP, 435 Sixth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

ASE Limited v. INCO Alloys International, Inc., Civil Action No. 98-1266, (W.D. Pa. 1998).  Testified for defendant concerning breach of computer services contract by declaratory judgment plaintiff.   Result: determination that defendant was free to seek services from a different vendor.

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. iCraveTV., 53 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1831 (W.D. Pa. 2000).  Testified for Plaintiffs concerning Internet technology used to stream video from U.S. TV stations through web sites in Canada.  Result: TRO and preliminary injunction issued against defendants prohibiting continued infringement in the U.S.  Contact: Gregory Jordan, Esq., Reed Smith LLP, 435 Sixth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Invited testimony before the British House of Lords, Subcommittee B of the European Union Committee, April 20, 2000.   Subject: European regulation of eCommerce.  View testimony.

Universal Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes, 111 F. Supp. 2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2000), aff'd 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001).  Served as an expert for plaintiff movie studios concerning accused software for decrypting DVDs in the first case interpreting the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.  Result: permanent injunction issued in favor of plaintiffs on August 17, 2000.  Contact: William Hart, Esq., Proskauer Rose LLP.  View testimony.  View opinion.  View appellate opinion.

MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:01-CV-736 (E.D. Va. 2001).  Served as an expert for defendant eBay in an infringement case concerning U.S. Patent 6,202,051 for Internet auctions.  Following Dr. Shamos' reports, Defendants obtained a summary judgment of noninfringement of the subject patent.   On the other patents, the case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that injunctions are not automatic in patent cases.   Contact: Tim Teter, Esq., Cooley Godward Kronish LLP.

Powerquest Corp. v. Quarterdeck Corp. et al., Case No. 2:97-CV-0783 (D. Utah 1997).  Served as an expert for plaintiff PowerQuest in an infringement case concerning U. S. Patents 5,675,769 and 5,706,472 for a method of resizing hard disk partitions.  Dr. Shamos testified at the Markman hearing.  Case settled when one of the defendants acquired plaintiff.  Contact: Gregg Anderson, Esq.Knobbe Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP.

Sightsound.Com Inc. v. N2K Inc. et al., C.A. 98-118 (W.D. Pa. 1998).  Served as an expert for defendants, including a subsidiary of Bertelsmann AG, concerning validity of U.S. Patents 5,191,573 and 5,966,440 for distribution of digital audio via telecommunications lines.  Case settled.  Contact: Steven M. Hayes, Esq., Parcher, Hayes & Snyder, 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110.

Freemarkets, Inc. v. B2eMarkets, Inc., C.A. 02-162-SLR (D. Del. 2002).  Served as an expert witness for plaintiff concerning infringement of U.S. patents 6,216,114 and 6,223,167, concerning methods of conducting electronic auctions.  Case settled two weeks after expert attended a demonstration of the accused product.  Contact: D. Michael Underhill, Esq., Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC.

Lifecast.com, Inc. v. ClubCorp, Inc., AAA Case No. 71Y1170076301 (Dallas, TX).  Served as an expert witness for respondent in a case alleging copyright infringement of Internet websites.  Testified at arbitration.  Result: Complainant's claims denied; award for respondent on counterclaims and for attorney's fees.  Contact: Bill Whitehill, Esq., Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, 1601 Elm St., Dallas, TX 75201.

IP Innovation LLC v. Thomson Learning, Inc. et al., Case H-02-2031 (S.D. Tex. 2002).  Served as a expert for defendant The Princeton Review, Inc. concerning alleged infringement of U.S. Patent 4,877,404 relating to online delivery of educational courses.  Summary judgment of non-infringement obtained for defendant after favorable Markman proceeding.  Contact: Peter Vogel, Esq., Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, 1601 Elm St., Dallas, TX 75201.

Starpay.com LLC et al. v. Visa International Service Association et al., Case 3-03-CV-976-L (N.D. Tex. 2003).  Served as an expert for defendant Visa concerning alleged infringement of U.S. Patent 5,903,878 relating to online authentication of credit card customers.  Dr. Shamos provided the court with a Markman tutorial in 2004 and a non-infringement and invalidity declaration in 2008.  Case settled in February 2008.  Contact: Stanley Young, Esq., Covington & Burling LLP, 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700, Redwood Shores, CA 94065.

Safeclick LLC v. Visa International Service Association et al., Case C-03-5865 (N.D. Cal. 2003).  Served as an expert for defendant Visa concerning alleged infringement of U.S. Patent 5,793,028 relating to online authentication of credit card customers.  Summary judgment of noninfringement granted for Visa based on expert reports, affirmed after appeal to the Federal Circuit.  Contact: Stanley Young, Esq., Covington & Burling LLP, 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700, Redwood Shores, CA 94065.

Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, NA et al. v. UBS Warburg Real Estate Securities, Inc., Case 02-2849 (192d Judicial District, Dallas Cty., Tex, 2002) and LaSalle Bank, NA et al. v. UBS Warburg Real Estate Securities, Inc., Case 02-2899-G (134th Judicial District, Dallas Cty., Tex, 2002).  Served as an expert for defendant UBS Warburg in an electronic discovery matter involving a case of first impression regarding Texas Discovery Rule 196.4 allocating costs of discovery of electronic records.  Status: pending.  Contact: Dawn Estes, Esq., Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, 1601 Elm St., Dallas, TX 75201.

American Association of People with Disabilities et al. v. Shelley et al., Case No. CV04-1526 FMC (PJWx) (C. D. Calif., 2004).  Served as an expert for plaintiff AAPD, which has brought a claim against the California Secretary of State that requiring DRE voting machines to be equipped with audit trails violates the rights of disabled persons.  Plaintiffs' application for TRO and preliminary injunction denied.  Contact: John McDermott. Esq., Howrey LLP, 550 South Hope St., Suite 1100, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

Paul Ware v. Target Corp., CA 4:03-CV-0243-HLM (N.D. Ga., 2003).  Served as an expert for defendant Target Corp., a large retailer, in a case involving U.S. patent 4,707,592, claiming a method of conducting credit card sales.  Case settled during Markman preparations.  Contact: Thomas Burke, Esq., Ropes & Gray LLP, 1211 Ave. of the Americas, New York, NY 10036.

Viad Corp., v. C. Alan Cordial et al., No. 03-1408 (W.D. Pa., filed 2003).  Served as an expert for defendants in an action alleging misappropriation of trade secrets relating to software for automating certain aspects of the exhibit booth and trade show industries.  Status: case settled immediately before trial, after plaintiff's unsuccessful Daubert challenge of Dr. Shamos.  Contact: Barbara Scheib, Esq., Cohen & Grigsby, P.C., 11 Stanwix Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222.

Schade et al. v. Maryland State Bd. of Elections et al., Case No. C0497297 (Cir. Ct. Anne Arundel Cty. Md., 2004).  Serving as an expert for defendants in a case challenging the decision of the Board of Elections not to decertify Diebold AccuVote system.  Result: Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction denied, upheld on appeal.  Judge Manck's opinion cites Dr. Shamos' testimony as follows: "the court finds Dr. Shamos, Defendants' expert, to be the true voice of reason and the most credible expert in this matter."  The denial of preliminary injunction was upheld by the Maryland Court of Appeals, which commented extensively on Dr. Shamos' testimony in its opinion.   Remainder of case is pending.  Contact: Michael Berman, Esq., (formerly Maryland Deputy Attorney General), Rifkin, Livingston, Levitan & Silver, LLC.

Wexler et al. v. Lepore et al., Case No. 04-80216 (CIV-COHN) (S.D. Fla. 2004) .  Served as an expert for defendants, various Florida election supervisors against claim by U.S. Congressman Robert Wexler that use of DRE voting machines without paper audit trails violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.  Dr. Shamos testified on Oct. 19, 2004.  The trial judge rendered judgment in favor of defendants on Oct. 25.  Contact: Jason Vail, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, The Capitol, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050.  Opinion.

Siemens Information and Communication Networks, Inc. v. Inter-Commercial Business Systems, Inc., Civil Action 3-03CV2171-L (N.D. Tex. 2004).  Served as an expert for defendant against claim of copyright infringement based on reverse-engineered firmware resident in telephone switching systems.  Status: case settled shortly after the submission of Dr. Shamos's rebuttal report on non-infringement.  Contact:  Bill Whitehill, Esq., Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, 1601 Elm St., Dallas, TX 75201.

Soverain Software LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., C.A. No. 6:04-CV-14 (E.D. Tex. 2004).  Served as an expert for plaintiff regarding asserted patents 5,708,780, 5,715,314 and 5,909,492, relating to the shopping cart paradigm of electronic commerce.   Status: settled in Sept. 2005 with Amazon paying $40 million to Soverain and taking a license under the patents in suit.   Contact: Thomas L. Giannetti, Esq., Jones Day, 222 E. 41st St., New York, NY 10017.

CollegeNET, Inc. v. The Princeton Review, Inc., Case '051205KI (D. Ore. 2005).  Served as a expert for defendant The Princeton Review, Inc. concerning alleged infringement of U.S. Patent 6,460,042 relating to online delivery of educational courses.  Case settled in December 2007.  Contact: Peter Vogel, Esq., Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, 1601 Elm St., Dallas, TX 75201.

CombineNet, Inc. v. Verticalnet. Inc., GD 05-018911 (Ct. Common Pleas, Allegheny Cty., PA).  Served as an expert for plaintiff in an action for trade secret misappropriation relating to a system for conducting electronic auctions.  Plaintiff won in arbitration.  Contact: Mark Knedeisen, Esq., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, 535 Smithfield Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2312.

RealSource, Inc. v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al., No. A04-CA-771-LY (W.D. Tex.).  Served as an expert for defendant Lowe's Companies, Inc., against a claim of infringement of U.S. patent 5,732,136 relating to validation of point-of-sale debit card transactions.   Provided a tutorial to the Court during Markman proceedings concerning debit card technology.  Defendants won summary judgment of non-infringement, affirmed by the Federal Circuit.  Defendants Lowe's settled and was not involved in the appeal.  Contact: Michael S. Connor, Esq., Alston & Bird LLP, Bank of America Plaza, 101 South Tryon St, Suite 4000, Charlotte, NC 28280-4000.

DE Technologies, Inc. v. Dell, Inc. et al., No. 7:04-CV-00628 (W.D. Va.).  Served as an expert for plaintiff DE Technologies, Inc., asserting a claim of infringement of U.S. patents 6,460,020 and 6,845,364,  relating to a system for implementing international sales transactions.  Case settled after and adverse summary judgment.  However, the Court used Dr. Shamos' testimony in its opinion.  Contact: David Marder, Esq., Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, 800 Boylston Street, 25th Floor, Boston, MA 02199.

Eaton Power Quality Corp. v. J.T. Packard & Associates, No. 05 C 3545 (N.D. Ill. 2005).  Served as expert for plaintiff in a claim of software copyright infringement involving a system for configuring industrial uninterruptible power supplies.  Case settled in early 2007.  Contact: Keith Schoeneberger, Esq., Dewey & LeBoeuf, Suite 1175, 180 North Stetson Ave., Chicago, IL 60601-6783.

Taylor et al. v. Onorato et al., CA 06-481 (W.D. Pa 2006).  Served as an expert for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania defendants in an action seeking to enjoin the use of electronic voting machines in Allegheny County, PA.  Dr. Shamos testified at length in a preliminary injunction hearing held April 25-27, 2006 before Judge Lancaster.  The injunction was denied on April 28.  Suit was subsequently dropped by plaintiffs.  Contact: Mark Aronchick, Esq., Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin, One Logan Square, 18th & Cherry Streets, 27th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. Applications International Corp., CA No. 03-1512 (W.D. Pa.).  Serving as an expert for defendant counterclaiming for copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation relating to software for maintaining occupational health and safety records.  Case is pending.  Contact: Ronald Hicks, Esq., Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP, 1300 Oliver Bldg., Pittsburgh, PA 15222.

NetMoneyIN, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc. et al., Cv-01-441-TUC-RCC (D. Ariz.).  Served as an expert for defendants Bank of America Merchant Services, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., who are accused of infringing claim 23 of U.S. patent 5,822,737, relating to an electronic payment system.  Wells Fargo and Bank of America have settled.  Contact: Robert Smith, Esq., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111-2950.

Contois Music Technology, LLC v. Apple Computer, Inc., 2:05-CV-163 (D. Vermont, filed Feb. 13, 2006).  Served as an expert for plaintiff in an action alleging that the Apple iTunes software infringed U.S. patent 5,864,868, relating to a method for selecting music from am electronic catalog.  Case settled after a favorable Markman order.  Contact: John Rabena, Esq., Sughrue Mion, PLLC, 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20037-3213.

Banfield et al. v. Cortes, 442 MD 2006 (PA Cmwlth. Ct.).  Serving as an expert for defendant Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in an action to compel the decertification of all electronic voting machines in Pennsylvania.  Case is pending.   In February 2008 Defendant successfully repelled an emergency motion for preliminary injunction.  Contact: Alan Promer, Esq., Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin, One Logan Square, 18th & Cherry Streets, 27th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

Remote Inventory Systems, Inc. v. WESCO Distribution, Inc., AAA Case No. 55 171 00493 05 (Pittsburgh, PA).  Served as an expert for respondent in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secrets in a computerized inventory system.   Contact: Kirsten Rydstrom, Esq., Reed Smith LLP, 435 Sixth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15219.

SyncSort, Inc. v. Innovative Routines International, Inc., Civil Action No.  04-3623 (WHW) (D. New Jersey).  Serving as an expert witness for defendant in an action alleging misappropriation of trade secrets embodied in plaintiff's Unix sorting software.  Case is pending.  Contact: David R. Fine, Esq., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, 17 N. Second Street, 18th Floor, Harrisburg, PA 17101-1507.

Digital Impact, Inc. v. Bigfoot Interactive, Inc., Civil Action C05 00636 (CW) (N.D. Cal.).  Served as an expert witness for defendant in an action alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 6,449,634, relating to determining which file formats can be processed by an email client.   Result: defendant obtained summary judgment of non-infringement, upheld by the Federal Circuit.  Contact: Arthur Dresner, Esq., Duane Morris LLP, 1540 Broadway, New York, NY 10036.

Prism Technologies LLC v. Verisign, Inc. et al., CA 05-214-JJF (D. Del.).  Served as an expert for plaintiff in an action alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 6,516,416, relating to use of a hardware key for authentication over networks.  Defendants prevailed on summary judgment of non-infringement, which was upheld on appeal.  Contact: Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP.

AdvanceMe, Inc. v. Rapidpay LLC et al., Civil Action 6:05-cv-424 LED (E.D. Tex., Tyler Division).  Served as an expert witness for plaintiff in an action alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 6,941,281, relating to an automated payment system for dividing credit card proceeds between a merchant and another party.  Testified at a bench trial in July 2007 before Judge Davis, who held the patent infringed but invalid for obviousness.  Contact: Ronald S. Lemieux, Esq., Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, Five Palo Alto Sq., Palo Alto, CA 94306.

IBM Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., CA 9:06-CV-242-RHC (E.D. Tex., Lufkin Div.) and IBM Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., CA 6:06-CV-452-LED (E.D. Tex., Marshall Div.).  Served as an expert for IBM in related actions alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 5,319,542, 5,442,771, 5,446,891, 5,796,967 and 7,072,849, all concerning methods of conducting electronic transactions, and a counterclaim for infringement of U.S. Patent 5,826,258, concerning a method for querying semistructured data.  Case settled early in discovery when the parties cross-licensed each other's patents.  Contact: Mark Ziegelbein, Esq., Jones Day, 2727 North Harwood Street, Dallas, TX 75201-1515.

The MathWorks, Inc. v. COMSOL AB et al., CA 6:06-CV-334 (E.D. Tex., Tyler Division).  Served as an expert for plaintiff The MathWorks, providers of the mathematical software system MATLAB, in an action alleging copyright infringement and infringement of U.S. Patents 7,051,338 and 7,181,745 concerning methods for invoking object methods from external environments.  After trial, the case settled with defendant admitting infringement, paying $12,000,000 in damages and waiving appeal rights.  Contact: Krista Schwartz, Esq., Jones Day, 77 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60601-1692.

Avante Int'l. Technology Corp. v. Diebold Election Systems et al., Case 4:06-CV-0978 TCM (E.D. Mo., Eastern Division).  Served as an expert for defendants Sequoia Voting Systems and Premier Election Systems in an action alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 6,892,944, 7,036,730 and 7,077,313 concerning electronic voting technology.  Dr. Shamos testified at a 5-day trial in February 2009.  Result: The jury found Plaintiff's asserted claims invalid as anticipated and obvious.  Contact: Peter Ewald, Esq., Oliff & Berridge, PLC, 277 South Washington Street, Suite 500, Alexandria, VA 22314.

ACLU of Ohio et al. v. Brunner et al., Case 1:09 CV 0145 (N.D. Ohio 2008).  Served as an expert witness in an action alleging that the use of central count optical scan voting should not be permitted in Cuyahoga County, as had been ordered by the county board of elections.   A preliminary injunction was denied in February 2008.  The case became moot and was dismissed in May 2008 when the Ohio Legislature granted by statute the relief requested by plaintiff, prohibiting the use of central count opscan in Cuyahoga County.  Contact: Meredith Bell-Platts, Esq., ACLU Voting Rights Project, 2600 Marquis One Tower, Atlanta, GA 30303.

Ariba, Inc. v. Emptoris, Inc., Civil Action 9:07-CV-90-RHC (E.D. Texas 2007).  Served as an expert for Ariba in an action alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 6,216,114 and 6,499,018, relating to the conduct of electronic auctions.  Dr. Shamos testified in a jury trial on infringement and validity.  Result: verdict finding all asserted claims valid and willfully infringed.  Contact: Robert Fram, Esq., Covington & Burling LLP, One Front St., San Francisco, CA 94111.

EpicRealm Licensing, LP v. Autoflex Leasing Inc. et al., CA 5:07-CV-125 (E.D. Texas 2005).  Served as an expert for defendant Herbalife International of America, Inc. in an action alleging infringement of U.S. patents 5,894,554 and 6,415,335, relating to a system for managing generation of dynamic Internet web pages.  All defendants have settled.  See also the Oracle case below.  Contact: Ognian Shentov, Esq., Jones Day, 222 E. 41st St., New York, NY 10017.  Also served as an expert for defendant FriendFinder in a separate trial in this action.  After a jury trial before Judge Folsom, the patents were found valid and infringed, but the jury awarded only $1.1M, the smallest amount testified to by defendant's damages expert.  Contact: Michael J. Sacksteder, Esq., Fenwick & West LLP, 555 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104.

Oracle Corporation v. EpicRealm Licensing, LP, CA 2-06-414 (D. Del. 2006).  Served as an expert for Oracle in a declaratory judgment alleging invalidity of U.S. patents 5,894,554 and 6,415,335, relating to a system for managing generation of dynamic Internet web pages.  The patents are the same as those in the EpicRealm case, above.  Oracle obtained summary judgment of non-infringement, now on appeal to the Federal Circuit.  Contact: Theodore Herhold. Esq., Townsend and Townsend and Crew, LLP, 379 Lytton Ave., Palo Alto. CA 94301.

Saulic v. Symantec Corporation et al., Case No. SA CV 07-610 AHS (C.D. Cal., Santa Ana Division, 2007).  Served as an expert for defendant Symantec in a removal action alleging violation of California Civil Code §1747.8, relating to the collection of personal identification information in connection with credit card transactions.   Contact: Chad Fuller, Esq., Foley & Lardner LLP, 11250 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92130.

Gusciora et al. v. McGreevey et al. (now Gusciora v. Corzine), Docket No. MER-L-2691-04 (N.J. Super., Mercer County).  Served as an expert for defendants, including the Governor and Attorney General of New Jersey, in a case alleging that the state's AVC Advantage voting machines are unconstitutionally insecure.  A bench trial was held from January-May, 2009 before Judge Linda Feinberg.  The Court's opinion adopts Dr. Shamos' testimony and comments on it extensively.   Contact: Leslie Gore, Esq., Asst. Atty. Gen'l., 25 Market Street, P.O. Box 112, Trenton, NJ 08625.

MOAEC, Inc. v. Pandora Media, Inc. et al., Case No. 07-cv-654-bbc (W.D. Wisc.).  Served as an expert for plaintiff in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 5,969,283, 6,232,539, 6,953,886 and 7,205,471, relating to systems for organizing and retrieving digital music.  Two defendants obtained summary judgment of noninfringement; the remaining defendant settled.  Contact: Joshua Krumholz, Esq., Holland & Knight, LLP, 10 St. James Avenue, 11th Floor, Boston, MA 02116.

Web.com, Inc. v. The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Case No. CV07-01552-PHX-MHM (D. Ariz.).  Served as an expert for defendant in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 6,654,804, 6,789,103, 6,842,769 and 6,868,444, relating to methods for managing configuration of web servers and provision of Internet services.  Case has settled.  Contact: Richard Frenkel, Esq., Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, 650 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304.

Hummel et al. v. Dynacraft BSC, Inc. et al., Case No. CV 052214 (Cal. Super. Marin Cty.).  Served as an expert for defendants in an action alleging breach of contract for web hosting services.  Dr. Shamos provided four hours of trial testimony.   Result: verdict for the defense.  Contact: Joe B. Harrison, Esq., Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, 1601 Elm St., Suite 3000, Dallas, TX 75201.

Tegg Corp. v. Beckstrom Electric Co. et al., Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-00435-NBF (W.D. Pa.).  Served as an expert for defendants in a case alleging infringement of copyright in computer software for administering field maintenance of electrical equipment.  Case has settled.  Contact: Richard Kelley, Esq., Reed Smith LLP, 3110 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 1400, Falls Church, VA 22042.

Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civil Action No. 06-491-MPT (D. Del.).  Serving as an expert for plaintiff in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 5,862,525, 6,088,717 and 6,757,710, relating to an infrastructure for conducting online transactions.  In August 2009 a jury found one patent valid but not infringed and another infringed but invalid.  Contact: Robert Abrahamsen, Esq., Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boson, MA 02210.

Anthurium Solutions, Inc. v. MedQuist, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:07-vcv-484 (DF/CE) (E.D. Texas).  Served as an expert for plaintiff in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 7,031,998, relating to a distributed workflow system.  Case settled ten days after responsive expert reports were served.  Contact: Joshua Krumholz, Esq., Holland & Knight, LLP, 10 St. James Avenue, 11th Floor, Boston, MA 02116.

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:07-cv-432(LED) (E.D. Texas).  Served as an expert for defendant Yahoo! in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 6,978,253, relating to determining prices for items sold online.  Case has settled as to defendant Yahoo!.  Contact: Michael A. Jacobs. Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, 425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.   Now serving as an expert for remaining defendants Google and AOL.  Contact: David A. Perlson. Esq., Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, 50 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94111.

CBS Interactive, Inc. v. Etilize, Inc., Case No. C -6-05378 (MHP) (N.D. Cal.).  Served as an expert for plaintiff in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 6,714,933 and 7,082,426, relating to web crawling technology to aggregate product information.  Defendant consented to an injunction against further infringement and the case settled.  Contact: Glenn E. Westreich, Esq., Winston & Strawn, LLP, 101 California Street, San Francsico, CA 94111.

Geographic Services, Inc. v. Anthony Collelo, Case 2008-9961 (Fairfax Cty., Va.)  Served as an expert for plaintiff in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secrets involving determining and proofing geographic names as applied to maps and satellite imagery.  Case was dismissed by Judge Ney on technical legal grounds at the close of Plainitff's case.  Contact: Mark Wasserman, Esq., Reed Smith LLP, 3110 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 1400, Falls Church, VA 22042.

ODS Technologies, LP v. Magna Entertainment Corp,  et al., CV 07-03265 DDP (D. Del.).  Serving as an expert for defendants in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 5,830,068, 6,004,211, 6,089,981, 6,554,709 and 7,229,354, relating to off-track wagering systems and methods for restricting wagering based on location.  Case is pending.  Contact: Virginia DeMarchi, Esq., Fenwick & West, LLP, 801 California Street, Mountain View, CA 94041.

Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. Office Media Network, Inc., C.A. No. 08-96-GMS (D.Del.).  Serving as an expert for defendant in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 6,288,688, 6,622,826, 6,981,576 and 7,270,219, relating to display of advertising information on screens in elevators.  Case settled shortly after Dr. Shamos's deposition.  Contact: Steven R. Trybus, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, 330 N. Wabash Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611.

Avante Int'l. Technology Corp. v. Premier Election Solutions et al., Case 4:06-CV-091367-ERW (E.D. Mo., Eastern Division).  Served as an expert for defendants Sequoia Voting Systems and Premier Election Systems in an action alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 7,422,150, and 7,431,209 concerning electronic voting technology.  Case settled in December 2009.  Contact: Peter Ewald, Esq., Oliff & Berridge, PLC, 277 South Washington Street, Suite 500, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Accenture Global Services GmbH et al. v. Guidewire Software, Inc., Civ. No. 07-826-SLR (D. Del.).  Serving as an expert for Accenture in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and infringement of U.S. Patents 7,013,284 and 7,017,111, relating to automated insurance claim handling.  Case is pending.  Contact: L. Scott Oliver, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, 755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304.

Alexsam, Inc. v. Evolution Benefits, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:07cv288-TJW (E.D. Texas).  Served as an expert for plaintiff in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 6,000,608, relating to multifunction epayment cards.  Case settled four weeks after Dr. Shamos's deposition.  Contact: James Foster, Esq., Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boson, MA 02210.

IMX, Inc. v. E-Loan, Inc. and Banco Popular North America, Inc., No. 09-20965 (S.D. Fla.).  Serving as an expert for defendants in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 5,995,947, relating to an interactive loan processing and mortgage trading system.  Case is pending.  Contact: Samuel A. Lewis, Esq., Feldman Gale, PA, One Biscayne Tower, 30th Floor, 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33131.

Soverain Software LLC v. Newegg, Inc., C.A. No. 6:07-CV-511 (E.D. Texas).  Serving as an expert for plaintiff in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 5,715,314, 5,909,492, and 7,272,639, relating to methods of conducting electronic commerce.   Case is pending.   Contact: Thomas L. Giannetti, Esq., Jones Day, 222 E. 41st St., New York, NY 10017.

Netcraft Corp. v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al., C.A. No. 07-651-GMS (D. Del.).  Serving as an expert for defendants in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 5,974,221, 6,351,738 and 6,411,940, relating to electronic commerce billing methods.  Case is pending.  Contact: H. Jonathan Redway, Esq., Dickinson Wright PLLC, 1875 Eye St., Washington, DC 20006.

ValueClick, Inc. v. Tacoda, Inc., AOL, LLC and Platform-A, Inc., Case No. 2:08-cv-04619 DSF (JCx) (C.D. Cal.).  Serving as an expert for defendants in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patents 5,848,396 and 5,991,735, relating to software and methods for creating psychographic profiles of network users.  Case is pending.  Contact: Paul R. Gupta, Esq., Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, 666 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10103.

SP Technologies, Inc. v. Garmin Limited et al., Civil Action No. 08-CV-3248 (N.D. Ill.).  Serving as an expert for TomTom, Inc. in a case alleging infringement of U.S. Patent 6,784,873, relating to graphical keyboards on touchscreens.  Case is pending.  Contact: Brian Pandya, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, 1776 K Street NW, Washington DC 20006.